People v. Russo, 814 N.E.2d 477 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004).

People v. Russo, 814 N.E.2d 477 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

green Positive treatment 4.3 score

34 citation events (34 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.

Strongest positive: People v. Jirdon (nyappdiv, 2018-03-23)

Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of

2004 2015 2026

Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗

discussed Cited "see" People v. Jirdon

N.Y. App. Div. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high

We also note that "defendant's release to parole supervision does not render his challenge moot because he remains under the control of the Parole Board until his sentence has terminated' " ( People v Sebring , 111 AD3d 1346 , 1347 [4th Dept 2013], lv denied 22 NY3d 1159 [2014]; see People v Rowell , 5 AD3d 1073, 1074 [4th Dept 2004], lv denied 2 NY3d 806 [2004]).

discussed Cited "see" BARBER, STEPHEN M., PEOPLE v

N.Y. App. Div. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high

We note at the outset that defendant’s release to parole supervision does not render moot his contention that the sentence is unduly harsh or severe because he “remains under the control of the Parole Board until his sentence has terminated” (People v Hannig, 68 AD3d 1779, 1780 , lv denied 14 NY3d 801 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see People v Rowell, 5 AD3d 1073, 1074 , lv denied 2 NY3d 806 ).

discussed Cited "see" People v. Barber

N.Y. App. Div. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high

We note at the outset that defendant’s release to parole supervision does not render moot his contention that the sentence is unduly harsh or severe because he “remains under the control of the Parole Board until his sentence has terminated” (People v Hannig, 68 AD3d 1779 , 1780 [2009], lv denied 14 NY3d 801 [2010] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see People v Rowell, 5 AD3d 1073, 1074 [2004], lv denied 2 NY3d 806 [2004]).

discussed Cited "see" People v. Barber

N.Y. App. Div. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high

We note at the outset that defendant’s release to parole supervision does not render moot his contention that the sentence is unduly harsh or severe because he “remains under the control of the Parole Board until his sentence has terminated” (People v Hannig, 68 AD3d 1779 , 1780 [2009], lv denied 14 NY3d 801 [2010] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see People v Rowell, 5 AD3d 1073, 1074 [2004], lv denied 2 NY3d 806 [2004]).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." People v. Hastings

N.Y. App. Div. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low

We note that, although defendant has been released from prison, she is nonetheless on parole and her appeal is therefore not moot (see People v Stewart, 185 AD2d 381, 382 [1992], lv denied 80 NY2d 977 [1992]; see also People v Rowell, 5 AD3d 1073 [2004], lv denied 2 NY3d 806 [2004]; compare People v Wemette, 285 AD2d 729, 731-732 [2001], lv denied 97 NY2d 689 [2001]).