green
Positive treatment
1.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Clow
Here, because our review of the record reflects that the plea and appeal waiver are, in all respects, valid and enforceable, we adhere to the principle that, “[b]y waiving [his] right to appeal, defendant agreed to end this matter entirely at sentencing and to abide by the [trial] court’s exercise of discretion in determining [his] sentence” (People v Hidalgo, supra at 737 [emphasis added]; see People v Boyce, 2 AD3d 1208, 1209 [2003], lv denied 2 NY3d 737 [2004]). “[I]n most situations, the appellate courts should honor such waivers [of the right to appeal]” (People v Callahan, supr…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Lowe
Thus, although defendant indeed received the maximum sentence permissible by statute (see Penal Law § 70.06 [3] [e]; [4] [b]), we find neither a clear abuse of discretion nor the existence of any extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction of the sentence in the interest of justice (see People v McKenzie, 28 AD3d 942, 943 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 759 [2006]; People v Ciarleglio, 299 AD2d at 572 ; see also People v Brickey, 3 AD3d 603, 604 [2004], lv denied 2 NY3d 737 [2004]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PEOPLE
v.
ALDEGON
v.
ALDEGON
New York Court of Appeals.
Mar 19, 2004.
Published
Application in criminal case for leave to appeal dismissed. (Graffeo, J.)