People v. Ferguson, 906 N.E.2d 1094 (NY 2009). · Go Syfert
People v. Ferguson, 906 N.E.2d 1094 (NY 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
78 citation events (78 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: People v. Hightower (nyappdiv, 2020-08-13)
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2009 2017 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" People v. Hightower
N.Y. App. Div. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
"Each case must be examined on its unique facts to determine the nature of the misconduct and the likelihood that prejudice was engendered" ( People v Irizarry , 83 NY2d 557, 561 [1994] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see People v Douglas , 57 AD3d 1105, 1106 [2008], lv denied 12 NY3d 783 [2009]).
discussed Cited "see" People v. Sindoni
N.Y. App. Div. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
The inconsistencies in the testimony as to defendant's description, together with the alibi evidence, presented "credibility issues for the trier of fact to determine" ( People v Wilson , 71 AD3d 1333, 1334 [2010]; see People v Douglas , 57 AD3d 1105, 1106 [2008], lv denied 12 NY3d 783 [2009]).
discussed Cited "see" People v. Sindoni
N.Y. App. Div. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
The inconsistencies in the testimony as to defendant's description, together with the alibi evidence, presented "credibility issues for the trier of fact to determine" ( People v Wilson , 71 AD3d 1333, 1334 [2010]; see People v Douglas , 57 AD3d 1105, 1106 [2008], lv denied 12 NY3d 783 [2009]).
discussed Cited "see" People v. Pratt
N.Y. App. Div. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
The accomplice charge was accurate because, "[w]here multiple crimes are charged and the record shows that the crimes involved a common plan or scheme, evidence corroborating the accomplice on one crime is sufficient to provide the required corroboration on the others" ( People v Spencer , 272 AD2d 682, 684 [2000], lv denied 95 NY2d 858 [2000]; see People v Thomas , 55 AD3d 357 , 359 [2008], lvs denied 12 NY3d 783 , 785, 788 [*3][2009]; People v Crow , 284 AD2d 653, 654 [2001], lv denied 96 NY2d 900 [2001]).
discussed Cited "see" Swartz v. St. Mary's Hospital of Amsterdam
N.Y. App. Div. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
Although a court must generally avoid inquiry into the jury’s deliberative process (see People v Brown, 48 NY2d 388, 393 [1979]; People v Karen, 17 AD3d 865, 867 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 764 [2005]), a jury’s verdict may be overturned by a showing of improper influence by a juror, including even “ ‘well-intentioned jury conduct which tends to put the jury in possession of evidence not introduced at trial’ ” (People v Maragh, 94 NY2d 569, 573 [2000], quoting People v Brown, 48 NY2d at 393 ; see People v Douglas, 57 AD3d 1105, 1106 [2008], lv denied 12 NY3d 783 [2009]).
discussed Cited "see" Swartz v. St. Mary's Hospital of Amsterdam
N.Y. App. Div. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
Although a court must generally avoid inquiry into the jury’s deliberative process (see People v Brown, 48 NY2d 388, 393 [1979]; People v Karen, 17 AD3d 865, 867 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 764 [2005]), a jury’s verdict may be overturned by a showing of improper influence by a juror, including even “ ‘well-intentioned jury conduct which tends to put the jury in possession of evidence not introduced at trial’ ” (People v Maragh, 94 NY2d 569, 573 [2000], quoting People v Brown, 48 NY2d at 393 ; see People v Douglas, 57 AD3d 1105, 1106 [2008], lv denied 12 NY3d 783 [2009]).
discussed Cited "see" People v. Artis
N.Y. App. Div. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
However, “not every misstep by a juror rises to the inherently prejudicial level at which reversal is required” (People v Brown, 48 NY2d 388, 394 [1979]; see People v Douglas, 57 AD3d 1105, 1106 [2008], lv denied 12 NY3d 783 [2009]).
discussed Cited "see" People v. Guitierrez
N.Y. App. Div. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
Contrary to defendant’s further contention, the court did not abuse its discretion in permitting the prosecutor to recall a witness well before the close of the People’s case and, after a limited cross-examination of that witness, to address an identification issue that the prosecutor failed to address during his direct examination of that witness (see People v Guiterrez, 270 AD2d 184 [2000]; People v Ketchmore, 132 AD2d 889 , 891 n [1987], lv denied 70 NY2d 752 [1987]; see generally People v Dennis, 55 AD3d 385 [2008], lv denied 12 NY3d 783 [2009]).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." People v. Kindell
N.Y. App. Div. · 2016 · signal: see also · confidence low
“Accordingly, the merits of the ineffectiveness claims may not be addressed on appeal” (People v Polanco, 121 AD3d 436, 437 [1st Dept 2014], lv denied 24 NY3d 1221 [2015]; see also People v Thomas, 55 AD3d 357 , 359-360 [1st Dept 2008], lv denied 12 NY3d 785 [2009], 12 NY3d 788 [2009], 12 NY3d 783 [2009]; see also People v Baron, 133 AD3d 516 [1st Dept 2015]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PEOPLE
v.
FERGUSON.
New York Court of Appeals.
Mar 13, 2009.
906 N.E.2d 1094
Published

Application in criminal cases for leave to appeal denied. (Ciparick, J.).