green
Positive treatment
10.7 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Rodriguez v. Madison Sec. Group, Inc.
Auth. , 3 AD3d 514, 514 [2d Dept 2004], lv denied 2 NY3d 705 [2004]; see Cortez v Delmar Realty Co., Inc. , 57 AD3d 313, 313 [1st Dept 2008], lv dismissed in part, denied in part 12 NY3d 774 [2009]).
cited
Cited "see"
Molina v. Appula Mgt. Corp.
Auth. , 3 AD3d 514, 514 [2d Dept 2004], lv denied 2 NY3d 705 [2004]; see Cortez v Delmar Realty Co., Inc. , 57 AD3d 313, 313 [1st Dept 2008], lv dismissed in part, denied in part 12 NY3d 774 [2009].
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Virella v. 245 N. St. Hous. Dev. Fund Corp.
Auth ., 3 AD3d 514, 514 [2d Dept 2004], lv denied 2 NY3d 705 [2004]; see Mills v Gardner , 106 AD3d 885, 886 [2d Dept 2013]; see also Cortez v Delmar Realty Co., Inc. , 57 AD3d 313, 313 [1st Dept 2008], lv dismissed in part and denied in part 12 NY3d 774 [2009]), and "[a] reasonable opportunity or effective means to control a third person does not arise from the mere power to evict" ( Siino v Reices , 216 AD2d 552, 553 [2d Dept 1995]; see Britt , 3 AD3d at 514 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Superior Ice Rink, Inc., Respondent,
v.
Nescon Contracting Corp., Doing Business as A1 Discount Painting, Et Al., Defendants, and Merchants Mutual Marine Insurance Company, Appellant
v.
Nescon Contracting Corp., Doing Business as A1 Discount Painting, Et Al., Defendants, and Merchants Mutual Marine Insurance Company, Appellant
New York Court of Appeals.
Mar 26, 2009.
906 N.E.2d 1063
Published
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.