MATTER OF CHASM HYDRO, INC. v. New York State Dept. of Envtl. Conservation, 12 N.Y.3d 710 (NY 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
MATTER OF CHASM HYDRO, INC. v. New York State Dept. of Envtl. Conservation, 12 N.Y.3d 710 (NY 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
100 citation events (100 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Moll v. Griffith (nyappdiv, 2022-08-04)
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2009 2017 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Moll v. Griffith
N.Y. App. Div. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
"To establish a cause of action under a theory of negligent entrustment, the defendant must . . . [*2]have some special knowledge concerning a characteristic or condition peculiar to the [person to whom a particular chattel is given] which renders [that person's] use of the chattel unreasonably dangerous" ( Monette v Trummer , 105 AD3d 1328, 1330 [4th Dept 2013], affd 22 NY3d 944 [2013] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Cook v Schapiro , 58 AD3d 664, 666 [2d Dept 2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 710 [2009]).
discussed Cited "see" People v. McCullen
N.Y. App. Div. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
Thus, "a person is prohibited from receiving jail time credit against a subsequent sentence when such credit has already been applied to time served on a previous sentence' " ( Matter of Graham v Walsh , 108 AD3d 1230, 1230 [4th Dept 2013]; see Matter of Blake v Dennison , 57 AD3d 1137, 1138 [3d Dept 2008], lv denied 12 NY3d 710 [2009]).
discussed Cited "see" People v. Drake
N.Y. App. Div. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
Thus, “a person is prohibited ‘from receiving jail time credit against a subsequent sentence when such credit has already been applied to time served on a previous sentence’ ” (Matter of Graham v Walsh, 108 AD3d 1230, 1230 [4th Dept 2013]; see Matter of Blake v Dennison, 57 AD3d 1137, 1138 [3d Dept 2008], lv denied 12 NY3d 710 [2009]).
discussed Cited "see" In re James U.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
“At a minimum, parents must take steps to correct the conditions that led to the removal of the child” (Matter of Nathaniel T., 67 NY2d 838, 840 [1986] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Matter of Alaina E., 59 AD3d 882, 885 [2009], Iv denied 12 NY3d 710 [2009]).
discussed Cited "see" In re Deon M.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
The deprivation of a party’s fundamental right to counsel is a denial of due process and requires reversal, without regard to the merits of the unrepresented party’s position” (Matter of Evan F., 29 AD3d 905, 906 [2006]; see Matter of Casey N, 59 AD3d 625, 627 [2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 710 [2009]; Matter of David VV., 25 AD 3d 882, 883-884 [2006]).
discussed Cited "see" In re Anastasia FF.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
By providing these services, petitioner established, by clear and convincing evidence, that it “made relevant and meaningful efforts to assist respondent in resolving the circumstances that led to the removal of the children in order to reunite the family” (Matter of Eric G., 59 AD3d 785, 786 [2009]; see Matter of Alaina E., 59 AD3d 882, 884-885 [2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 710 [2009]; Matter of Isaiah F., 55 AD3d 1004, 1004 [2008]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
MATTER OF CHASM HYDRO, INC.
v.
NEW YORK STATE DEPT. OF ENVTL. CONSERVATION.
New York Court of Appeals.
May 12, 2009.
12 N.Y.3d 710
Published

Motion for leave to appeal granted.