People v. Burt, 912 N.E.2d 1086 (NY 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Burt, 912 N.E.2d 1086 (NY 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
61 citation events (61 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: People v. Warner (nyappdiv, 2021-05-06)
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2009 2017 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" People v. Warner
N.Y. App. Div. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
To convict defendant of overdriving, torturing and injuring animals — a misdemeanor offense — the People were required to prove, as relevant here, that defendant "unjustifiably injured, maimed, [or] mutilated" an animal (Agriculture and Markets Law § 353; see People v Bowe , 61 AD3d 1185, 1186 [2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 923 [2009]).
discussed Cited "see" People v. Henriquez
N.Y. App. Div. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
Thus, the record establishes that the People did not “merely go through the motions of asking [the] witness to testify,” with the “ulterior goal of keeping the witness off the stand” (id. at 200; see People v Brooks, 62 AD3d 511, 511 [1st Dept 2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 923 [2009]).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Muench
N.Y. App. Div. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
A [j]udge who relinquishes control over the proceedings or delegates the duty to supervise deprives a [respondent] of the right to a trial by jury, requiring reversal” (People v Toliver, 89 NY2d 843, 843-844 [1996]; see People v Bosa, 60 AD3d 571, 572 [2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 923 [2009]).
discussed Cited "see" STATE OF NEW YORK v. MUENCH, KARL
N.Y. App. Div. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
A [j]udge who relinquishes control over the proceedings or delegates the duty to supervise deprives a [respondent] of the right to a trial by jury, requiring reversal” (People v Toliver, 89 NY2d 843, 844 ; see People v Bosa, 60 AD3d 571, 572 , lv denied 12 NY3d 923 ).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." People v. Perez
N.Y. Sup. Ct. · 2012 · signal: compare · confidence low
In New York, an overnight guest may have a legitimate expectation of privacy in premises that are not his own (People v Ortiz, 83 NY2d 840, 842 [1994]; People v Kemp, 273 AD2d 806, 806 [4th Dept 2000]; People v Williams, 181 AD2d 474, 475 [1st Dept 1992], lv denied 79 NY2d 1055 [1992]; People v Jones, 20 Misc 3d 1133[A] , 2008 NY Slip Op 51715[U] , *4 [Sup Ct, NY County 2008]; compare People v Blake, 61 AD3d 770 , 770 [2d Dept 2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 923 [2009] [apartment where defendant arrested not his residence and no proof presented that he had a reasonable expectation of privacy therein]…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PEOPLE
v.
BURT.
New York Court of Appeals.
Jul 29, 2009.
912 N.E.2d 1086
Published

Application in criminal case for leave to appeal denied. (Smith, J.).