green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2009
2017
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Matter of Glassman v. Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection of the State of N.Y.
Respondent is vested with "the sole discretion to determine the merits of claims presented for reimbursement, the amount of such reimbursement and the terms under which such reimbursement shall be made" (Judiciary Law § 468-b [4]; accord Matter of Feng Li v Knight , 201 AD3d 1048, 1049 [3d Dept 2022], lv denied 38 NY3d 907 [2022]; see 22 NYCRR 7200.4 [g]). [FN2] In reviewing respondent's determination, we may not substitute our judgment and are instead "limited to deciding whether respondent's determination is arbitrary and capricious, lacks a rational basis or reflects an abuse of discretion…
discussed
Cited "see"
Matter of Yengo v. Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection of The State of New York
Noting that the only purchaser named in the purported January 2007 sales contract was HSD, and that the contract identified Haber as the attorney who would hold the down payment for HSD, respondent determined that no compensation could be made arising from Haber's "fiduciary obligations as an escrow agent when he was not acting as [petitioners'] attorney or in the practice of law." Respondent has "the sole discretion to determine the merits of claims presented for reimbursement, the amount of such reimbursement and the terms under which such reimbursement shall be made" (Judiciary Law § 468�…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PEOPLE
v.
CZAPLICKI.
v.
CZAPLICKI.
Published
Motion for leave to appeal denied.[*].
[*] Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic or denied.