green
Positive treatment
2.8 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Sullivan v. Thorndike
See Hogan v. Lagosz, 124 Conn. App. 602, 612 , 6 A.3d 112 (2010), cert. denied, 299 Conn. 923 , 11 A.3d 151 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wittman v. Intense Movers, Inc.
We know of no authority that precludes contracting parties from engaging in subsequent negotiations to clarify or to modify the agreement that they had earlier reached.’’ Willow Funding Co. v. Grencom Associates, 63 Conn. App. 832 , 843–44, 779 A.2d 174 (2001). ‘‘More important . . . [when] the general terms on which the parties indisputably had agreed . . . included all the terms that were essential to an enforceable agreement . . . [u]nder the modern law of contract . . . the parties . . . may reach a binding agreement even if some of the terms of that agreement are still indefinit…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dale J. Hogan Et Al.
v.
Teresa B. Lagosz
v.
Teresa B. Lagosz
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 4, 2011.
Jonathan M. Starble, in support of the petition., Kevin M. O'Brien and Neil E. Atlas, in opposition.
Eveleigh.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 124 Conn. App. 602 (AC 30545), is denied.
EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.