green
Positive treatment
Trending · 98 recent citers
3.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Davis v. Marshall & Sterling, Inc.
"A restraint is reasonable only if it: (1) is no greater than is required for the protection of the legitimate interest of the employer, (2) does not impose undue hardship on the employee, and (3) is not injurious to the public," and the burden rests upon defendant, the entity seeking to enforce the restraint, to demonstrate that all three of those prongs have been met ( id. at 388-389 [emphasis and citations omitted]; accord [*6] Brown & Brown, Inc. v Johnson , 25 NY3d 364, 369 [2015]; see Scott, Stackrow & Co., C.P.A.'s, P.C. v Skavina , 9 AD3d 805, 806 [3d Dept 2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 612 […
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Doomes v. Best Transit Corp.
Although the federal enactment does preserve the right, in some instances, to a common-law remedy ( 49 USC § 30103 [e]), a suit alleging the failure to install airbags is preempted (Geier v American Honda Motor Co., 529 US 861 [2000]; see also Chevere v Hyundai Motor Co., 4 AD3d 226, 227 [2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 612 [2004]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DEMPSTER
v.
OVERVIEW EQUITIES, INC.
v.
OVERVIEW EQUITIES, INC.
Published
Motion for leave to appeal denied.