People v. Irwin, 816 N.E.2d 203 (NY 2004). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Irwin, 816 N.E.2d 203 (NY 2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
36 citation events (36 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Santone v. Fischer (ca2, 2012-08-07)
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited "see" Santone v. Fischer (3×)
2d Cir. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See People v. Irwin, 5 A.D.3d 9 1122 , 774 N.Y.S.2d 237 (4th Dep't) ("Irwin I"), lv. denied, 3 N.Y.3d 642 , 782 N.Y.S.2d 413 (2004). 10 Rejecting the above sufficiency arguments made by Irwin, the Appellate Division noted that 11 the victim's wounds required surgery and, although the victim was unavailable 12 to testify, photographs depicting the sutured wounds to the victim's arm and 13 hand were admitted in evidence.
discussed Cited "see" Santone v. Fischer
2d Cir. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See People v. Irwin, 5 A.D.3d 9 1122 , 774 N.Y.S.2d 237 (4th Dep't) ("Irwin I"), lv. denied, 3 N.Y.3d 642 , 782 N.Y.S.2d 413 (2004). 10 Rejecting the above sufficiency arguments made by Irwin, the Appellate Division noted that 11 the victim's wounds required surgery and, although the victim was unavailable 12 to testify, photographs depicting the sutured wounds to the victim's arm and 13 hand were admitted in evidence.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." People v. Williams
N.Y. App. Div. · 2025 · signal: see also · confidence low
As an alternative holding, we find no basis for reversal ( see People v D'Alessandro , 184 AD2d 114, 118-119 [1st Dept 1992], lv denied 81 NY2d 884 [1993]; see also People v Johnson , 6 AD3d 226, 228 [1st Dept 2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 642 [2004]; People v Martinez , 287 AD2d 353, 354 [1st Dept 2001], lv denied 97 NY2d 685 [2001]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PEOPLE
v.
IRWIN
New York Court of Appeals.
Jun 23, 2004.
816 N.E.2d 203
Published

Application in criminal case for leave to appeal—Denied. (R.S. Smith, J.)