Ingargiola v. Waheguru Mgt., Inc., 3 N.Y.3d 656 (NY 2004). · Go Syfert
Search
Ingargiola v. Waheguru Mgt., Inc., 3 N.Y.3d 656 (NY 2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
59 citation events (59 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: HSBC BANK USA, N.A. v. KNOX, JEAN R. (nyappdiv, 2012-06-19)
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" HSBC BANK USA, N.A. v. KNOX, JEAN R.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
In such circumstances, “[e]quity will not permit a knowing cofiduciary to maintain a suit against another cofiduciary for a breach of their joint obligations” (Matter of Bloomingdale, 48 AD3d 559, 561 ; see Matter of McCormick, 304 AD2d 759, 760 , lv dismissed 3 NY3d 656 , 733; see generally Matter of Niles, 113 NY 547, 557-559 , rearg denied 21 NE 1118 ).
discussed Cited "see" In re the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate Account of Knox
N.Y. App. Div. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
In such circumstances, “[ejquity will not permit a knowing cofiduciary to maintain a suit against another cofiduciary for a breach of their joint obligations” (Matter of Bloomingdale, 48 AD3d 559, 561 [2008]; see Matter of McCormick, 304 AD2d 759 , 760 [2003], lv dismissed 3 NY3d 656 [2004], lv dismissed 3 NY3d 733 [2004]; see generally Matter of Niles, 113 NY 547, 557-559 [1889], rearg denied 21 NE 1118 [1889]).
discussed Cited "see" In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate Account of HSBC Bank USA, N.A.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
In such circumstances, “[e]quity *1659 will not permit a knowing cofiduciary to maintain a suit against another cofiduciary for a breach of their joint obligations” (Matter of Bloomingdale, 48 AD3d 559 , 561 [2008]; see Matter of McCormick, 304 AD2d 759 , 760 [2003], lv dismissed 3 NY3d 656 [2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 733 [2004]; see generally Matter of Niles, 113 NY 547, 557-559 [1889], rearg denied 21 NE 1118 1889]).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Ben Gruber Inc.
N.Y. Surr. Ct., Putnam Cty. · 2025 · signal: compare · confidence low
The main focus of the litigation is the alleged conduct of Eric Gruber in wrongfully transferring bank funds to different companies — not whether the estate is entitled to any portion thereof ( see Matter of O'Connell , 98 AD3d at 674; compare Matter of Denton , 6 AD3d 531, 532 [2d Dept 2004], lvs denied 3 NY3d 656 [2004], 5 NY3d 714 [2005]).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Ben Gruber Inc.
N.Y. Surr. Ct., Putnam Cty. · 2025 · signal: compare · confidence low
The main focus of the litigation is the alleged conduct of Eric Gruber in wrongfully transferring bank funds to different companies — not whether the estate is entitled to any portion thereof ( see Matter of O'Connell , 98 AD3d at 674; compare Matter of Denton , 6 AD3d 531, 532 [2d Dept 2004], lvs denied 3 NY3d 656 [2004], 5 NY3d 714 [2005]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
INGARGIOLA
v.
WAHEGURU MGT., INC.
New York Court of Appeals.
Jun 29, 2004.
3 N.Y.3d 656
Published

Motion for leave to appeal/appeals dismissed on finality grounds.