Mccabe v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 818 N.E.2d 667 (NY 2004). · Go Syfert
Mccabe v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 818 N.E.2d 667 (NY 2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
130 citation events (130 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Dacaj v. New York City Tr. Auth. (nyappdiv, 2019-03-21)
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Dacaj v. New York City Tr. Auth.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
Similarly, the jury's award for future loss of earnings was not so "utterly irrational" as to be against the weight of the evidence ( Cohen v Hallmark Cards , 45 NY2d 493, 499 [1978]; see Tassone v Mid-Valley Oil Co. , 5 AD3d 931, 932 [3d Dept 2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 608 [2004]; Calo v Perez , 211 AD2d 607, 608 [2d Dept 1995]).
cited Cited "see" In Re Emanuel
Bankr. S.D.N.Y. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Heller, 9 A.D.3d 221 , 780 N.Y.S.2d 314 (N.Y.App.Div.), leave to appeal denied, 3 N.Y.3d 607 , 785 N.Y.S.2d 25 , 818 N.E.2d 667 (2004).
discussed Cited "see" Remillard v. Louis Williams, Inc.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
Nor do we find any compelling facts or circumstances “from which the requisite knowledge [of defendant] could reasonably be inferred” that the alcoholic beverages were actually being purchased for Zulauf (Sherman v Robinson, 80 NY2d at 488 ; accord Kindzierski v Foster, 217 AD2d 998, 999 [1995]; see Ahigian v Davis, 6 AD3d 956, 957 [2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 608 [2004]; Jacobs v Amodeo, 208 AD2d at 1172 ).
discussed Cited "see" In re Alijah XX.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
When presented with such an argument, “we must review the record to determine whether petitioner established by clear and convincing evidence that it exercised diligent efforts to strengthen the parent-child relationship and to reunite the family and, second, that respondent has not maintained sufficient contact with the child or planned for the child’s future” (Matter of Karina U., 299 AD2d 772, 772 [2002], lv denied 100 NY2d 501 [2003]; see Matter of Ariel PP., 9 AD3d 628, 628-629 [2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 608 [2004]).
discussed Cited "see" Doe v. Holy See
N.Y. App. Div. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
Defendants’ sponsorship of religious and educational programs for its minor parishioners, however, was not, in itself, sufficient to create a fiduciary relationship with plaintiff (see Doe v Holy See [State of Vatican City], 17 AD3d 793 [2005]; see generally Mars v Diocese of Rochester, 6 AD3d 1120, 1121 [2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 608 [2004]; Doe v Holy See [State of Vatican City], 6 AD3d 1228, 1228-1229 [2004]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McCABE
v.
STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO.
New York Court of Appeals.
Sep 21, 2004.
818 N.E.2d 667
Published

Motion for leave to appeal denied.