Matter of Renz v. Home Depot USA, Inc., 935 N.E.2d 799 (NY 2010). · Go Syfert
Search
Matter of Renz v. Home Depot USA, Inc., 935 N.E.2d 799 (NY 2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
19 citation events (19 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Sheridan v. Sheridan (nyappdiv, 2015-06-19)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Sheridan v. Sheridan
N.Y. App. Div. · 2015 · signal: see also · confidence low
We would therefore modify the order in appeal No. 1 by awarding sole custody to defendant father with visitation to the mother and remit the matter to Supreme Court for a different justice to fashion an appropriate visitation schedule (see id. at 1451 ; see also Sitts v Sitts, 74 AD3d 1722, 1723-1724 [2010], lv dismissed 15 NY3d 833 [2010], lv denied 18 NY3d 801 [2011]).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Sheridan v. Sheridan
N.Y. App. Div. · 2015 · signal: see also · confidence low
We would therefore modify the order in appeal No. 1 by awarding sole custody to defendant father with visitation to the mother and remit the matter to Supreme Court for a different justice to fashion an appropriate visitation schedule (see id. at 1451 ; see also Sitts v Sitts, 74 AD3d 1722, 1723-1724 [2010], lv dismissed 15 NY3d 833 [2010], lv denied 18 NY3d 801 [2011]).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." SHERIDAN, KELLY G. v. SHERIDAN, DAVID E.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2015 · signal: see also · confidence low
We would therefore modify the order in appeal No. 1 by awarding sole custody to defendant father with visitation to the mother and remit the matter to Supreme Court for a different justice to fashion an appropriate visitation schedule (see id. at 1451 ; see also Sitts v Sitts, 74 AD3d 1722, 1723-1724 , lv dismissed 15 NY3d 833 , lv denied 18 NY3d 801 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of the Claim of Cindy A. Renz, Appellant,
v.
Home Depot USA, Inc., Et Al., Respondents. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent
Motion No: 2010-713.
New York Court of Appeals.
Sep 16, 2010.
935 N.E.2d 799
Published

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.