People v. MacK, 935 N.E.2d 801 (NY 2010). · Go Syfert
People v. MacK, 935 N.E.2d 801 (NY 2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v.
Ronald MacK, Appellant
208 SSM 42.
New York Court of Appeals.
Sep 21, 2010.
935 N.E.2d 801
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Muldoon & Getz, Rochester (Gary Muldoon of counsel), for appellant., Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens (Merri Turk Lasky of counsel), for respondent.
Published

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed. Defendant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see People v Borrell, 12 NY3d 365, 369 [2009]).

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.