People v. Buonincontri, 835 N.E.2d 667 (NY 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Buonincontri, 835 N.E.2d 667 (NY 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
70 citation events (70 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: FLINN, GUNTHER J., PEOPLE v (nyappdiv, 2012-09-28)
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" FLINN, GUNTHER J., PEOPLE v
N.Y. App. Div. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
“The mere fact that a sentence imposed after trial is greater than that offered in connection with plea negotiations is not proof that defendant was punished for asserting his right to [a] trial” (People v Simon, 180 AD2d 866, 867 , lv denied 80 NY2d 838 ; see People v Chappelle, 14 AD3d 728, 729 , lv denied 5 NY3d 786 ).
discussed Cited "see" People v. Flinn
N.Y. App. Div. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
“The mere fact that a sentence imposed after trial is greater than that offered in connection with plea negotiations is not proof that defendant was punished for asserting his right to [a] trial” (People v Simon, 180 AD2d 866, 867 [1992], lv denied 80 NY2d 838 [1992]; see People v Chappelle, 14 AD3d 728, 729 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 786 [2005]).
discussed Cited "see" People v. Flinn
N.Y. App. Div. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
“The mere fact that a sentence imposed after trial is greater than that offered in connection with plea negotiations is not proof that defendant was punished for asserting his right to [a] trial” (People v Simon, 180 AD2d 866, 867 [1992], lv denied 80 NY2d 838 [1992]; see People v Chappelle, 14 AD3d 728, 729 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 786 [2005]).
discussed Cited "see" MILLER, MARCUS, PEOPLE v
N.Y. App. Div. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
In any event, his contention is without merit. “[T]he mere fact that a sentence imposed after trial is greater than that offered in connection with plea negotiations is not proof that defendant was punished for asserting his right to trial . . ., and there is no evidence in the record that the sentencing court was vindictive” (Lombardi, 68 AD3d at 1765-1766 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see People v Chappelle, 14 AD3d 728, 729 , lv denied 5 NY3d 786 ; see generally People v Pena, 50 NY2d 400, 411-412 , rearg denied 51 NY2d 770 , cert denied 449 US 1087 ).
discussed Cited "see" People v. Miller
N.Y. App. Div. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
In any event, his contention is without merit. “[T]he mere fact that a sentence imposed after trial is greater than that offered in connection with plea negotiations is not proof that defendant was punished for asserting his right to trial . . . , and there is no evidence in the record that the sentencing court was vindictive” (Lombardi, 68 AD3d at 1765-1766 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see People v Chappelle, 14 AD3d 728, 729 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 786 [2005]; see generally People v Pena, 50 NY2d 400, 411-412 [1980], rearg denied 51 NY2d 770 [1980], cert denied 449 US 1087 [1981]…
discussed Cited "see" People v. Comfort
N.Y. App. Div. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
“Trial courts have broad discretion and wide latitude to limit cross-examination on collateral matters designed to impeach the victim’s credibility” (People v Love, 307 AD2d 528, 532 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 643 [2003]; see generally People v Corby, 6 NY3d 231, 234-235 [2005]), and “[t]he record does not support the contention of defendant that the court violated his fundamental right to present a defense by refusing to allow him to call . . . witness[es] in his own behalf’ (People v Bradley, 17 AD3d 1050, 1052 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 786 [2005]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PEOPLE
v.
BUONINCONTRI
New York Court of Appeals.
Jul 28, 2005.
835 N.E.2d 667
Published

Application in criminal case for leave to appeal granted. (Ciparick, J.).