green
Positive treatment
7.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Pinckney v. Lee
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
Pinckney, 6 N.Y.3d at 897.
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Ibarrondo
Here, defendant’s statement was provoked or encouraged by the presentation or discussion of evidence suggestive of his criminal conduct, and we thus conclude that it cannot be deemed “spontaneous in the literal sense of that word as having been made without apparent external cause” (Stoesser, 53 NY2d at 650 ; see People v Ramos, 27 AD3d 1073, 1074-1075 [2006], lv dismissed 6 NY3d 897 [2006]; People v Newport, 149 AD2d 954, 955-956 [1989]).
discussed
Cited "see"
IBARRONDO, EMMANUEL, PEOPLE v
Here, defendant’s statement was provoked or encouraged by the presentation or discussion of evidence suggestive of his criminal conduct, and we thus conclude that it cannot be deemed “spontaneous in the literal sense of that word as having been made without apparent external cause” (Stoesser, 53 NY2d at 650 ; see People v Ramos, 27 AD3d 1073, 1074-1075 , lv dismissed 6 NY3d 897 ; People v Newport, 149 AD2d 954, 955-956 ).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Lapi
Under the prompt outcry rule, “evidence that a victim of sexual assault promptly complained about the incident is admissible to corroborate the allegation that an assault took place” (People v Rosario, 17 NY3d 501, 511 [2011] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see People v Perkins, 27 AD3d 890, 892 [2006], lv denied 6 NY3d 897 [2006]; People v Allen, 13 AD3d 892, 895 [2004], lv denied 4 NY3d 883 [2005]). “ ‘[Promptness is a relative concept dependent on the facts— what might qualify as prompt in one case might not in another’ ” (People v Rosario, 17 NY3d at 512-513…
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Lapi
Under the prompt outcry rule, “evidence that a victim of sexual assault promptly complained about the incident is admissible to corroborate the allegation that an assault took place” (People v Rosario, 17 NY3d 501, 511 [2011] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see People v Perkins, 27 AD3d 890, 892 [2006], lv denied 6 NY3d 897 [2006]; People v Allen, 13 AD3d 892, 895 [2004], lv denied 4 NY3d 883 [2005]). “ ‘[Promptness is a relative concept dependent on the facts— what might qualify as prompt in one case might not in another’ ” (People v Rosario, 17 NY3d at 512-513…
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Denno
Defendant appeals arguing that County Court erred in imposing consecutive sentences and in assessing the reparation. “ [Sentences may be imposed to run consecutively when multiple offenses are committed through separate and distinct acts, though they are part of a single transaction” (People v Ramirez, 89 NY2d 444, 451 [1996]; see People v Perkins, 27 AD3d 890, 893-894 [2006], Ivs denied 6 NY3d 897 [2006], 7 NY3d 761 [2006]; People v May, 263 AD2d 215, 221 [2000], lv denied 94 NY2d 950 [2000]; cf. People v Dean, 8 NY3d 929, 930-931 [2007]).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Borthwick
Such inconsistencies, given the attendant circumstances, do not measure up to the type of disclosures which would render a witness’s testimony incredible as a matter of law or establish a basis “upon which to disturb [the jury’s] resolution of these credibility issues” (People v Campbell, 17 AD3d 925, 926 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 760 [2005]; see People v Perkins, 21 AD3d 890, 892 [2006], lvs denied 6 NY3d 897 [2006], 7 NY3d 761 [2006]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
People
v.
Serrano.
v.
Serrano.
New York Court of Appeals.
May 25, 2006.
Published
Application in criminal cases for leave to appeal denied. (Graffeo, J.).