green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.9 score
“ors 135.747 does, in fact, place a burden on the state to bring a defendant to trial within a reasonable period of time .”
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Allen
ors 135.747 does, in fact, place a burden on the state to bring a defendant to trial within a reasonable period of time .
discussed
Cited "see"
Handam v. Wilsonville Holiday Partners, LLC
Holien, 298 Or at 90 ; see Brown / Shidler v. Board of Education, 207 Or App 163, 169 , 139 P3d 1048 , rev den, 342 Or 253 (2006) (explaining that a job-related right is “a personal benefit or right to which the employee is entitled as a matter of public policy’).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Forsyth
See State v. Ayers, 207 Or App 668 , 685 n 10, 143 P3d 251 , rev den, 342 Or 253 (2006) (rejecting contention that absconding or committing new crimes necessarily defeats a defendant’s speedy trial rights).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Haugen
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Saner, 342 Or 254 , 149 P3d 1213 (2006) (on own motion, vacating order denying review); Zimmerlee v. Baldwin, 330 Or 281 , 6 P3d 1100 (2000) (vacating on own motion denial of petition for review 14 months later); Ponder v. Baldwin, 330 Or 281 , 6 P3d 1100 (2000) (on own motion, granting reconsideration and withdrawing order denying review); Cooper v. Maass, 329 Or 10 , 994 P2d 119 (1999) (on own motion, reconsidering petition for review previously denied and withdrawing order denying review).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State
v.
Boggs
v.
Boggs
S54226.
Oregon Supreme Court.
Dec 19, 2006.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Oregon (1)
Petitions for review Denied.