MATTER OF VISCOMI v. Vill. of Herkimer, 845 N.E.2d 468 (NY 2006). · Go Syfert
Search
MATTER OF VISCOMI v. Vill. of Herkimer, 845 N.E.2d 468 (NY 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
75 citation events (75 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Leonard v. Wenz (nyappdiv, 2021-06-10)
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Leonard v. Wenz
N.Y. App. Div. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
Although generally a factual issue best suited for resolution by the trier of fact, a "determination of special employment status may be made as a matter of law where the particular, undisputed critical facts compel that conclusion and present no triable issue of fact" ( Thompson v Grumman Aerospace Corp. , 78 NY2d at 557-558 ; see Ribeiro v Dynamic Painting Corp. , 23 AD3d 795, 796 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 707 [2006]).
discussed Cited "see" Matter of Engelhart v. Bowman
N.Y. App. Div. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
The petitioner “bears the burden of demonstrating such change in circumstances, and *1294 his [or her] petition must ‘allege facts which, if established, would afford a basis for relief ” (Matter of Christopher B. v Patricia B., 75 AD3d 871, 872 [2010] [internal citation omitted], quoting Matter of Bryant-Bosshold v Bosshold, 273 AD2d 717, 718 [2000]; see Matter of Bjork v Bjork, 23 AD3d 784, 785 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 707 [2006]).
discussed Cited "see" Robare v. Fortune Brands, Inc.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2007 · signal: accord · confidence high
The doctrine of equitable estoppel will prohibit the defendant from raising a statute of limitations defense “ ‘where [the] plaintiff was induced by [the defendant’s] fraud, misrepresentations or deception to refrain from filing a timely action’ [and] the plaintiff . . . reasonably] reli[ed] on the defendant’s misrepresentations” (Zumpano v Quinn, 6 NY3d 666, 674 [2006], quoting Simcuski v Saeli, 44 NY2d 442 , 449 [1978]; accord Doe v Holy See [State of Vatican City], 17 AD3d 793, 794 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 707 [2006]; see Putter v North Shore Univ.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." John Doe No. 23 v. Archdiocese of Miami, Inc.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Doe v. Holy See (State of Vatican City), 17 A.D.3d 793 , 793 N.Y.S.2d 565, 569 (2005), appeal denied, 6 N.Y.3d 707 , 812 N.Y.S.2d 443 , 845 N.E.2d 1274 (2006); Franke v. Geyer, 209 Ill.App.3d 1009 , 154 Ill.Dec. 710 , 568 N.E.2d 931, 934 (1991).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Suthers v. Amgen Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Doe v. Holy See (State of Vatican City), 17 A.D.3d 793, 795-96 , 793 N.Y.S.2d 565 (3d Dep’t 2005), Iv. to appeal denied, 6 N.Y.3d 707 (2006) (no fiduciary relationship between local church member and the Vatican).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
MATTER OF VISCOMI
v.
VILLAGE OF HERKIMER
New York Court of Appeals.
Feb 14, 2006.
845 N.E.2d 468
Published

Motion for leave to appeal denied.