People v. Jackson, 4 N.Y.3d 887 (NY 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Jackson, 4 N.Y.3d 887 (NY 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
47 citation events (47 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: People v. Jones (nyappdiv, 2019-05-23)
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" People v. Jones
N.Y. App. Div. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
Simply put, appellate review of defendant's challenge to his status as a youthful offender in connection with his conviction of assault in the first degree "was waived by [his] failure to raise [such] issue on his initial appeal" ( People v Leacock , 237 AD2d 306, 306 [1997], lv denied 89 NY2d 1096 [1997]; see People v Harrington , 14 AD3d 944, 945 [2005], lv denied 4 NY3d 887 [2005]; People v Winslow , 36 AD2d 997, 998 [1971]).
discussed Cited "see" People v. Agha
unknown court · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
A synoptic evaluation is essential because ‘[v]iewed singly, these may not be persuasive, yet when viewed together the puzzle may fit and probable cause [may be] found’ ” (People v Shulman, 6 NY3d 1, 26 [2005], cert denied — US —, 126 S Ct 1623 [2006]; see generally People v Lazo, 16 AD3d 1153 [2005], lv denied 4 NY3d 887 [2005]; People v Glasgow, 12 AD3d 1172 [2004], lv denied 4 NY3d 763 [2005]).
discussed Cited "see" People v. Schmitt
N.Y. App. Div. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
“Defendant’s responses to [the c]ourt’s questions unequivocally established that defendant understood the proceedings and was voluntarily waiving the right to appeal” (People v Gilbert, 17 AD3d 1164, 1164 [2005]; see People v Jeter, 15 AD3d 885 [2005], lv denied 4 NY3d 887 [2005]).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." People v. M&M Medical Transport, Inc.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2017 · signal: see also · confidence low
Defendant contends that the criminal action should be dismissed in furtherance of justice but, by pleading guilty, it has forfeited its right to raise that issue on appeal (see People v Smith, 100 AD3d 936, 937 [2012]; People v Guerra, 123 AD2d 882, 882 [1986]; see also People v Harris, 15 AD3d 848, 848 [2005], lv denied 4 NY3d 887 [2005]), and we likewise decline to consider that contention as a matter of our discretion in the interest of justice {see CPL 470.15 [3] [c]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PEOPLE
v.
JACKSON (TYRONE)
New York Court of Appeals.
May 11, 2005.
4 N.Y.3d 887
Published

Application in criminal case for leave to appeal dismissed. (Kaye, Ch.J.).