Strobel v. State, 282 N.E.2d 331 (NY 1972). · Go Syfert
Search
Strobel v. State, 282 N.E.2d 331 (NY 1972). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Saarinen v. Kerr
NY · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
The courts, however, have from time to time also used such terms as "unreasonable under the circumstances” (Simmen v State of New York, 55 NY2d 924, 926 ; Rightmyer v State of New York, 108 AD2d 1047 ; Zulauf v State of New York, 119 Misc 2d 135 , affd 110 AD2d 1042 ; see also, Strobel v State of New York, 36 AD2d 485 , affd 30 NY2d 629 ; cf., Mercado v Vega, 161 AD2d 365, 366 , revd on other grounds 77 NY2d 918 [want of "due care”]) and "negligent” (Stanton v State of New York, 26 NY2d 990, 992 , supra; Thain v City of New York, 35 AD2d 545 , affd 30 NY2d 524 ; Murphy v City of New York…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
John Strobel, Individually and as Father of Thomas Strobel, Appellant,
v.
State of New York, Respondent. (Claim No. 50618.)
New York Court of Appeals.
Mar 16, 1972.
282 N.E.2d 331
Published

Sheila Birnbaum, Emile Z. Berman, A. Harold Frost and Morton H. Feder for appellant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Peter Joseph Dooley and Ruth Kessler Toch of counsel), for respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.