In Re Wisehart, 759 N.E.2d 369 (NY 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
In Re Wisehart, 759 N.E.2d 369 (NY 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events (25 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Barhite v. Town of DeWitt (nyappdiv, 2016-11-18)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Barhite v. Town of DeWitt
N.Y. App. Div. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
Schs., 114 AD3d 1181 , 1182 [2014]; see Matter of Thomas v Stone, 284 AD2d 627, 628 [2001], appeal dismissed 96 NY2d 935 [2001], lv denied 97 NY2d 608 [2002], cert denied 536 US 960 [2002]).
cited Cited "see" BARHITE, DALE v. TOWN OF DEWITT
N.Y. App. Div. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
Schs., 114 AD3d 1181 , 1182; see Matter of Thomas v Stone, 284 AD2d 627, 628 , appeal dismissed 96 NY2d 935 , lv denied 97 NY2d 608 , cert denied 536 US 960 ).
cited Cited "see" Barhite v. Town of DeWitt
N.Y. App. Div. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
Schs., 114 AD3d 1181 , 1182 [2014]; see Matter of Thomas v Stone, 284 AD2d 627, 628 [2001], appeal dismissed 96 NY2d 935 [2001], lv denied 97 NY2d 608 [2002], cert denied 536 US 960 [2002]).
discussed Cited "see" SPEIS, LAURA v. PENFIELD CENTRAL SCHOOLS
N.Y. App. Div. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
Here, petitioner made her demand upon respondent no later than December 23, 2011, upon her filing of the petition, which “may be construed as the demand” (Matter of Meegan v Griffin, 161 AD2d 1143, 1143 , lv denied 76 NY2d 710 , rearg denied 76 NY2d 1018 ; see Matter of Thomas v Stone, 284 AD2d 627, 628 , lv dismissed 96 NY2d 935 , lv denied 97 NY2d 608 , cert denied 536 US 960 ).
discussed Cited "see" Speis v. Penfield Central Schools
N.Y. App. Div. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
Here, petitioner made her demand upon respondent no later than December 23, 2011, upon her filing of the petition, which “may be construed as the demand” (Matter of Meegan v Griffin, 161 AD2d 1143, 1143 [1990], lv denied 76 NY2d 710 [1990], rearg denied 76 NY2d 1018 [1990]; see Matter of Thomas v Stone, 284 AD2d 627, 628 [2001], lv dismissed 96 NY2d 935 [2001], lv denied 97 NY2d 608 [2002], cert denied 536 US 960 [2002]).
discussed Cited "see" Speis v. Penfield Central Schools
N.Y. App. Div. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
Here, petitioner made her demand upon respondent no later than December 23, 2011, upon her filing of the petition, which “may be construed as the demand” (Matter of Meegan v Griffin, 161 AD2d 1143, 1143 [1990], lv denied 76 NY2d 710 [1990], rearg denied 76 NY2d 1018 [1990]; see Matter of Thomas v Stone, 284 AD2d 627, 628 [2001], lv dismissed 96 NY2d 935 [2001], lv denied 97 NY2d 608 [2002], cert denied 536 US 960 [2002]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Arthur M. Wisehart (Admitted as Arthur McKee Wisehart), an Attorney, Appellant. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Respondent
New York Court of Appeals.
Sep 20, 2001.
759 N.E.2d 369
Kaye and Judge Ciparick Taking No Part.
Published

On the Court’s own motion, appeal, insofar as taken from the Appellate Division order of suspension, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no appeal lies as of right from the unanimous order of the Appellate Division absent the direct involvement of a substantial constitutional question (see, CPLR 5601); insofar as taken from the order of an individual justice[*936] of the Appellate Division, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no appeal lies from such order (see, NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b]; CPLR 5601); insofar as taken from the Appellate Division order denying leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the order of an individual justice of the Appellate Division, dismissed upon the ground that no appeal lies from such order (see, NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b]; CPLR 5602); insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judge Ciparick taking no part.