discussed Cited "see" People v. Nickles The rationale of Lyles is that jurors ordinarily do not realize that a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity does not result in the accused’s immediate freedom as does the not guilty verdict in the usual case, and that they should be told, therefore, that the verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity means that the accused will be confined to a mental hospital until the proper authorities are satisfied "that such person has recovered his sanity and will not in the reasonable future be dangerous to himself or others.” (Lyles, supra, p 728.) (See, also, Kuk v State of Nevada, 80 Nev …