green
Positive treatment
Issue: prudent person standardNY ↗
Issue: performance doctrineNY ↗
2.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
HSBC BANK USA N.A. v. KNOX, IV, SEYMOUR H.
We remitted the matter to the Surrogate for a recalculation of the amount of surcharges regarding the Woolworth stock, using *1496 the lost capital methodology, i.e., the formula validated by the Court of Appeals (id. at 320; see Matter of Janes, 90 NY2d 41, 55 [1997], rearg denied 90 NY2d 885 [1997]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of The Estate of Rodney B. Janes, Deceased. Lincoln First Bank, N. A. (Successor by Consolidation to Lincoln First Bank of Rochester), as Coexecutor of Rodney B. Janes, Deceased, Appellant-Respondent; Howard Ullman as Personal Representative of The Estate of Cynthia W. Janes, Deceased, et al., Respondents-Appellants.
Published
Motion, treated as a motion for reargument or, alternatively, for clarification of the Court of Appeals opinion and remittitur, denied. [See, 90 N.Y.2d 41.]