green
Positive treatment
Issue: prosecution of its eviction claimNY ↗
Issue: residence requirementNY ↗
Issue: law recognizes presumptionNY ↗
Issue: specificity requirementNY ↗
3.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Niagara Capital LLC v. Cruz
Respondent did not raise any issue regarding the sufficiency of the notice in his answer ( see Rogers v New York Tel Co. , 74 AD2d 526 [1980]) and, in any event, the notice was, under the circumstances of this case, "as a whole sufficient adequately to advise [respondent] and to permit [him] to frame a defense" ( Rascoff/Zsyblat Org. v Directors Guild of Am. , 297 AD2d 241 , 242 [2002], lv dismissed in part and denied in part 99 NY2d 573 [2003]; see Hughes v Lenox Hill Hosp ., 226 AD2d 4, 17 [1996], lv denied 90 NY2d 829 [1997] ; City of New York v Valera, 216 AD2d 237 [1995]).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sung Yoon Kim v. Hettinger
A predicate notice in a holdover summary proceeding need not lay bare a landlord's trial proof, and will be upheld in the face of a "jurisdictional" challenge where, as here, the notice is "as a whole sufficient[ly] adequate[] to advise ... tenant and to permit it to frame a defense" ( Rascoff/Zsyblat Org. v Directors Guild of Am. , 297 AD2d 241 , 242 [2002], lv dismissed in part and denied in part 99 NY2d 573 [2003]; see Hughes v Lenox Hill Hosp. , 226 AD2d 4, 18 [1996], lv denied 90 NY2d 829 [1997]).
discussed
Cited "see"
McGoldrick v. DeCruz
A predicate notice in a holdover summary proceeding need not lay bare a landlord’s trial proof, and will be upheld in the face of a “jurisdictional” challenge where, as here, the notice is “as a whole sufficient adequately to advise * * * tenant and to permit it to frame a defense” (Rascoff/Zsyblat Org. v Directors Guild of Am., 297 AD2d 241, 242 [2002]; see, Hughes v Lenox Hill Hosp., 226 AD2d 4, 18 [1996], lv dismissed in part and denied in part 90 NY2d 829 [1997]).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ferrara v. Superintendent, New York State Police
See Ferrara v. Superintendent, New York State Police, 235 A.D.2d 874 , 652 N.Y.S.2d 432, 433 (N.Y.App.Div.1997), appeal dismissed, leave to appeal denied, 90 N.Y.2d 829 , 660 N.Y.S.2d 551 , 683 N.E.2d 16 (N.Y.1997).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Tze Hao Yen v. Ramos
Co. v Camlakides, 173 AD2d 193 , affd 78 NY2d 1098 ; see also, Hughes v Lenox Hill Hosp., 226 AD2d 4, 18 , lv denied 90 NY2d 829 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Charles Hili, Appellant,
v.
Phillip Coombe, Jr., as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, Et Al., Respondents
v.
Phillip Coombe, Jr., as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, Et Al., Respondents
New York Court of Appeals.
Jun 5, 1997.
683 N.E.2d 17
Published
On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Motion for leave to appeal denied. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.