People v. Bruckman, 389 N.E.2d 1105 (NY 1979). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Bruckman, 389 N.E.2d 1105 (NY 1979). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v.
James David Bruckman, Appellant
New York Court of Appeals.
Mar 29, 1979.
389 N.E.2d 1105
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Joseph A. Shifflett and Nathaniel A. Barrell for appellant., Edward C. Cosgrove, District Attorney (John J. De Franks of counsel), for respondent.
Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg Concur.
Cited by 10 opinions  |  Published

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Inasmuch as defendant failed to object to the verdict as returned by the jury, his claim of repugnancy was not preserved for appellate review. (See People v Parks, 59 AD2d 543, 544; People v Incherchera, 56 AD2d 852; cf. Matter of Oliver v Justices of N. Y. Supreme Ct. of N. Y. County, 36 NY2d 53, 58; People v Quilles, 48 AD2d 933.)

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.