discussed Cited "see, e.g." MOTOR VEHICLE MFRS. v. State Co. , 46 N.Y.2d 1040 ; see also , Matter of McKenna v County of Nassau Off. of County Attorney , 75 AD2d 815 , affd 51 N.Y.2d 902 ) as follows: "[W]e generally will not vacate an arbitrator's award where the error claimed is the incorrect application of a rule of substantive law * * * unless it is so `irrational as to require vacatur'".

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Ass'n of the United States, Inc. v. State Co., 46 NY2d 1040 ; see also, Matter of McKenna v County of Nassau Off. of County Attorney, 75 AD2d 815 , affd 51 NY2d 902 ) as follows: "[W]e generally will not vacate an arbitrator’s award where the error claimed is the incorrect application of a rule of substantive law * * * unless it is so 'irrational as to require vacatur’ ”.

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Reilly v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. Thus, by clear implication, the double benefit was available to insured persons prior to the December 1, 1977 effective date of the amendment (see, Wellington v City of New York, 101 Misc 2d 970 ; see also, Matter of McKenna v County of Nassau Off. of County Attorney, 75 AD2d 815 , affd 51 NY2d 902 ; Amidon v Firemen’s Ins.