Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Dischiavi v. Calli
Here, the evidence that defendants sought to preclude was highly relevant to the issue whether the actions in question involved “an attempt by the attorney to rectify an alleged act of malpractice” that would constitute continuing representation sufficient to toll the statute of limitations (Luk Lamellen U. Kupplungbau GmbH v Lerner, 166 AD2d 505, 506-507 [1990]; see Weiss v Manfredi, 83 NY2d 974, 977 [1994], rearg denied 84 NY2d 848 [1994]; DeStaso v Condon Resnick, LLP, 90 AD3d 809, 812-813 [2011]).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dischiavi v. Calli
Here, the evidence that defendants sought to preclude was highly relevant to the issue whether the actions in question involved “an attempt by the attorney to rectify an alleged act of malpractice” that would constitute continuing representation sufficient to toll the statute of limitations (Luk Lamellen U. Kupplungbau GmbH v Lerner, 166 AD2d 505, 506-507 [1990]; see Weiss v Manfredi, 83 NY2d 974, 977 [1994], rearg denied 84 NY2d 848 [1994]; DeStaso v Condon Resnick, LLP, 90 AD3d 809, 812-813 [2011]).
discussed
Cited "see"
DISCHIAVI, GARY M. v. CALLI, JR., WILLIAM S.
Here, the evidence that defendants sought to preclude was highly relevant to the issue whether the actions in question involved “an attempt by the attorney to rectify an alleged act of malpractice” that would constitute continuing representation sufficient to toll the statute of limitations (Luk Lamellen U. Kupplungbau GmbH v Lerner, 166 AD2d 505, 506-507 ; see Weiss v Manfredi, 83 NY2d 974, 977 , rearg denied 84 NY2d 848 ; DeStaso v Condon Resnick, LLP, 90 AD3d 809, 812-813 ).
discussed
Cited "see"
Loveless Family Trust v. Koenig
As the Court further wrote in Myers , “a tenant-in-common seeking to assert a successful claim of adverse possession is required to show more than mere possession; the cotenant must also commit acts constituting ouster” (id. at 633; see Trevisano v Giordano, 202 AD2d 1071 [1994], appeal dismissed 84 NY2d 848 [1994]; Perkins v Volpe, 146 AD2d 617 [1989], lv dismissed 74 NY2d 791 [1989]).
discussed
Cited "see"
Columbus Steel Castings Co. v. Transp. Transi, 06ap-1247 (12-13-2007)
See, generally, Weiss v. Manfredi (N.Y. 1994), 83 N.Y.2d 974 , 976 , 639 N.E.2d 1122 , reargument denied, 84 N.Y.2d 848 , 641 N.E.2d 155 (explaining that "the settled doctrine of collateral estoppel * * * bars a party from relitigating in a subsequent proceeding an issue clearly raised in a prior proceeding and decided against that party where the party to be precluded had a full and fair opportunity to contest the prior determination"); People v. Aguilera (N.Y. 1993), 82 N.Y.2d 23 , 29 , 623 N.E.2d 519 (explaining that "[collateral estoppel, or `issue preclusion' * * * is a common-law doctrin…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Marie Trevisano, Individually and as Sole Distributee of the Estate of Lillian Apuzzo, Deceased, Appellant,
v.
Salvatore Giordano Et Al., Respondents
v.
Salvatore Giordano Et Al., Respondents
Published
Motion to vacate the Court of Appeals June 22, 1994 rule 500.9 (b) (22 NYCRR 500.9 [b]) order of dismissal granted. [See, 83 NY2d 963.] On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no appeal lies from the unanimous order of the Appellate Division absent the direct involvement of a substantial constitutional question (CPLR 5601). Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.