Moses & Singer, L. L. P. v. S&S Mach. Corp., 707 N.E.2d 441 (NY 1998). · Go Syfert
Search
Moses & Singer, L. L. P. v. S&S Mach. Corp., 707 N.E.2d 441 (NY 1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: People v. Smith (nyappdiv, 2017-06-30)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" People v. Smith
N.Y. App. Div. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
It is well settled that a trial court has broad discretion to limit the scope of a hearing (see People v Duran, 6 AD3d 809, 810 [2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 639 [2004]; see generally People v Sorge, 301 NY 198, 201-202 [1950]), and this is not a situation in which defendant was “denied the opportunity for a full inquiry” (People v Bryce, 246 AD2d 75, 79 [1998], appeal dismissed 92 NY2d 1024 [1998]; see People v Days, 150 AD3d 1622, 1623-1624 [2017]). *1957 Contrary to defendant’s further contention, the evidence at the hearing on remittal supported the court’s determination.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Moses & Singer, L. L. P., Respondent,
v.
S&S MacHinery Corp. Et Al., Appellants
New York Court of Appeals.
Dec 22, 1998.
707 N.E.2d 441
Published

Motion for leave to appeal by appellant Simon Srybnik dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action as to said appellant within the meaning of the Constitution; motion by appellant S&S Machinery Corp., insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed that part of the Supreme Court order that disqualified appellants’ attorney, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion by appellant S&S Machinery Corp. for leave to appeal otherwise denied.