green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Numrich Gun Parts Corp. v. Rivera
“Labor Law § 626 makes it clear that the procedures set forth in Labor Law §§ 620 through 625 are the exclusive method for challenging unemployment insurance determinations” (Prowse v State of New York, 4 AD3d 581, 582 [2004]; see Vartanian v Research Found, of State Univ. of N.Y., 227 AD2d 744, 746 [1996], appeal dismissed 88 NY2d 1053 [1996], lv dismissed and denied 89 NY2d 965 [1997]; Institute for Resource Mgt. v Roberts, 122 AD2d 465, 467 [1986], lv denied 69 NY2d 602 [1986]).
discussed
Cited "see"
Numrich Gun Parts Corp. v. Rivera
“Labor Law § 626 makes it clear that the procedures set forth in Labor Law §§ 620 through 625 are the exclusive method for challenging unemployment insurance determinations” (Prowse v State of New York, 4 AD3d 581, 582 [2004]; see Vartanian v Research Found, of State Univ. of N.Y., 227 AD2d 744, 746 [1996], appeal dismissed 88 NY2d 1053 [1996], lv dismissed and denied 89 NY2d 965 [1997]; Institute for Resource Mgt. v Roberts, 122 AD2d 465, 467 [1986], lv denied 69 NY2d 602 [1986]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Michael H. Vartanian, Appellant,
v.
Research Foundation of State University of New York et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.
v.
Research Foundation of State University of New York et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.
Published
Motion, pursuant to CPLR 5520 (a), for an extension of time[*1054] in which to file in the court of original instance the timely served notice of appeal granted. On the Court's own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.