green
Positive treatment
3.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "see"
Bahrle v. Exxon Corp.
(3×)
See Balsam v. Delma Engineering Corp., 139 A.D.2d 292 , 532 N.Y.S.2d 105, 108-09 , appeal dismissed in part, denied in part 73 N.Y.2d 783 , 536 N.Y.S.2d 741 , 533 N.E.2d 671 (1988) (holding that oil company did not have sufficient control over service station activities to be liable for injuries caused by dangerous condition at *159 the station).
discussed
Cited "see"
Crescenzi v. Supreme Court of State of NY
(2×)
See 73 N.Y.2d 784 , 533 N.E.2d 671 , 536 N.Y.S.2d 741 (1988). 2 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Trent-Clark v. City of New York
Corp., 103 AD3d 428 , 429 [1st Dept 2013]; see also Balsam v Delma Eng’g Corp., 139 AD2d 292, 299 [1st Dept 1988], lv dismissed in part, denied in part 73 NY2d 783 [1988]).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Trent-Clark v. City of New York
Corp., 103 AD3d 428 , 429 [1st Dept 2013]; see also Balsam v Delma Eng’g Corp., 139 AD2d 292, 299 [1st Dept 1988], lv dismissed in part, denied in part 73 NY2d 783 [1988]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
MacLeod v. Pete's Tavern, Inc.
Contrary to defendants’ arguments, we do not find that this type of use is comparable to a line or group of customers standing outside of a business establishment waiting to conduct business inside, which, this Court has held, does not constitute a special use (Tortora v Pearl Foods, 200 AD2d 471 ; see also, Balsam v Delma Eng’g Corp., 139 AD2d 292 , lv dismissed in part and denied in part 73 NY2d 783 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rachel Balsam Et Al., Appellants,
v.
Delma Engineering Corporation Et Al., Respondents, Et Al., Defendants
v.
Delma Engineering Corporation Et Al., Respondents, Et Al., Defendants
New York Court of Appeals.
Nov 29, 1988.
533 N.E.2d 671
Cited by 90 opinions | Published
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as denied plaintiffs motion to amend the complaint, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.