Matter of Shaw v. Bd. of Elections of the City of New York, 299 N.E.2d 261 (NY 1973). · Go Syfert
Search
Matter of Shaw v. Bd. of Elections of the City of New York, 299 N.E.2d 261 (NY 1973). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Ruck v. Greene County Board of Elections (nyappdiv, 2009-08-21)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Ruck v. Greene County Board of Elections
N.Y. App. Div. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
Moreover, “[n]o fraud or purpose to circumvent the statute is shown by the record in th[is] case” (Matter of Farbstein v Suchman, 26 NY2d 564, 566-567 [1970]; see Matter of Shaw v Board of Elections of City of N.Y., 32 NY2d 833, 834 [1973]), nor is there any proof raising an inference that the mistake caused any confusion among the voters.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of J. Stanley Shaw, Appellant,
v.
Board of Elections of the City of New York, and Robert F. Wagner Et Al., Respondents
New York Court of Appeals.
May 23, 1973.
299 N.E.2d 261
Jesse I. Levine for appellant., Herbert Rubin, Abraham M. Fuss, Robert J. Levinsohn, Edward L. Birnbaum and Rose L. Rubin for respondents.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Soden. *

*

Designated pursuant to section 2 of article VI of the State Constitution in place of Breitel, J.