Peterson v. Corbin, 742 N.E.2d 121 (NY 2000). · Go Syfert
Peterson v. Corbin, 742 N.E.2d 121 (NY 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: RG & RH, Inc. v. Schmidt's Auto Body & Glass, Inc. (nyappdiv, 2013-05-03)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" RG & RH, Inc. v. Schmidt's Auto Body & Glass, Inc.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
“Preliminary injunctive relief is a drastic remedy [that] is not routinely granted” (Marietta Corp. v Fairhurst, 301 AD2d 734, 736 [2003]; see Peterson v Corbin, 275 AD2d 35, 37 [2000], appeal dismissed 95 NY2d 919 [2000]).
discussed Cited "see" RG & RH, INC. v. SCHMIDT'S AUTO BODY & GLASS, INC.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
Greenawalt and Juanita Greenawalt-Slobe from engaging in any business activity that is similar to or in direct competition with defendant’s business activity within a five-mile radius of 2200 Military Road in Niagara Falls during the pendency of this action. -2- 269 CA 12-01869 “Preliminary injunctive relief is a drastic remedy [that] is not routinely granted” (Marietta Corp. v Fairhurst, 301 AD2d 734, 736 ; see Peterson v Corbin, 275 AD2d 35, 37 , appeal dismissed 95 NY2d 919 ).
discussed Cited "see" RG & RH, Inc. v. Schmidt's Auto Body & Glass, Inc.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
“Preliminary injunctive relief is a drastic remedy [that] is not routinely granted” (Marietta Corp. v Fairhurst, 301 AD2d 734, 736 [2003]; see Peterson v Corbin, 275 AD2d 35, 37 [2000], appeal dismissed 95 NY2d 919 [2000]).
discussed Cited "see" Sutherland Global Services, Inc. v. Stuewe
N.Y. App. Div. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
“Preliminary injunctive relief is a drastic remedy [that] is not routinely granted” (Marietta Corp. v Fairhurst, 301 AD2d 734, 736 [2003]; see Peterson v Corbin, 275 AD2d 35, 37 [2000], appeal dismissed 95 NY2d 919 [2000]; Cool Insuring Agency v Rogers, 125 AD2d 758, 759 [1986], appeal dismissed 69 NY2d 1037 [1987]).
examined Cited "see, e.g." Tucker v. All Metro Home Care Servs., Inc. (3×)
N.Y. App. Div. · 2025 · signal: see also · confidence low
Finally, the motion court correctly concluded that the Window Guard Law (24 RCNY 131.15) imposed no statutory duty on the Estate to install same for this incapacitated plaintiff ( Milano at 479; see also Rodriguez v City of New York , 272 AD2d 68 [1st Dept 2000], lv dismissed in part, denied in part 95 NY2d 919 [2000]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gregory P. Peterson, Appellant,
v.
Roger H. Corbin Et Al., Respondents
New York Court of Appeals.
Nov 21, 2000.
742 N.E.2d 121
Published

On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the Appellate Division order denying the preliminary injunction did not necessarily affect the final judgment of Supreme Court, as required by CPLR 5601 (d). Motions for a stay and a preference dismissed as academic.