Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Samuel Cherico, Joseph Cherico, & Anthony Cherico, Doing Bus. as Clarion Fruit Co., 313 F.2d 633 (3rd Cir. 1963). · Go Syfert
Search
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Samuel Cherico, Joseph Cherico, & Anthony Cherico, Doing Bus. as Clarion Fruit Co., 313 F.2d 633 (3rd Cir. 1963). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “proper maintenance and support”
15 citation events across 6 distinct courts.
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Booher v. United States
S.D. Ohio · 1973 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
proper maintenance and support
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner
v.
Samuel CHERICO, Joseph Cherico, and Anthony Cherico, Doing Business as Clarion Fruit Company, Respondent
14064_1.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Feb 27, 1963.
313 F.2d 633
James Harkless, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. General Counsel, Marcel, Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Atty., National Labor Relations Bd., on the brief), for petitioner.
Kalodner, Staley, Smith.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 57%
Citer courts: S.D. Ohio (1)
PER CURIAM.

On review of the record we are of the opinion that the National Labor Relations Board has jurisdiction; that substantial evidence supports its findings that the respondents violated Section 8 (a) (1) and Section 8(a) (3) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, and that the Board’s Order is valid and proper.

For the reasons stated the Board’s petition for enforcement will be granted.