Sun Oil Co. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 313 F.2d 637 (10th Cir. 1963). · Go Syfert
Search
Sun Oil Co. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 313 F.2d 637 (10th Cir. 1963). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
42 citation events across 13 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1963 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1963 1994 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Barbara House v. City of Grenada
N.D. Miss. · 1966 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see, Clark v. Thompson, 313 F.2d 637 (5th Cir. 1963), affirming per curiam Clark v. Thompson, 206 F.Supp. 539 (D.C.Miss.1962); Bailey v. Patterson, 369 U.S. 31 , 82 S.Ct. 549 , 7 L.Ed.2d 512 (1962) and Hackett v. Kincade, 36 F.R.D. 442 (D.C.Miss.1964).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sun Oil Company
v.
Federal Power Commission
7018_1.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Jan 15, 1963.
313 F.2d 637
Published

313 F.2d 637

SUN OIL COMPANY
v.
FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION.

No. 7018.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

January 15, 1963.

On petition to review and set aside an order of the Federal Power Commission.

Robert E. May, Omar L. Crook and Francis H. Caskin, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Richard A. Solomon, Gen. Counsel, and Howard A. Wahrenbrock, Solicitor, Federal Power Commission, Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and PICKETT and LEWIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Petition to review withdrawn by petitioner January 15, 1963.