green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Kronich
VI. [2] State v, Kirkpatrick, No. 77719-6, ___ Wash. at ___, 161 P.3d at 991 , 2007 WL 2003401 (Wash. Supreme Ct. July 12, 2007) (citing Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 68 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 , 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004)). [3] Id., ___ Wash. at ___-___, 161 P.3d at 991-92 , 2007 WL 2003401 (citing Crawford, 541 U.S. at 68 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 ; Davis v. Washington, ___ U.S. ___, 126 S.Ct. 2266, 2273 , 165 L.Ed.2d 224 (2006)). [4] Id., ___ Wash. at ___, 161 P.3d at 991 , 2007 WL 2003401 . [5] See State v. Kronich, 131 Wash.App. 537, 545-47 , 128 P.3d 119 (2006). [6] See ER 902(d). [7] While Smith was…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. King
See State v. Kronich, 131 Wash.App. 537 , 128 P.3d 119, 123 (collecting cases and holding “public records, like business records, should not be considered ‘testimonial’ statements for purposes of applying Crawford”), review granted, 157 Wash.2d 1008 , 139 P.3d 349 (2006); Taulton, 29 Cal.Rptr.3d at 206 (same analysis should apply to public records as business records for purpose of Confrontation Clause analysis); see also Bohsancurt, 212 Ariz. 182, ¶ 21 , 129 P.3d at 477 (“The essence of a public record is that it is created by a public agency.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE
v.
BETSCHART.
v.
BETSCHART.
77215-1.
Washington Supreme Court.
Jul 6, 2006.
Published
Disposition of petition for review denied.