Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Delsea Iron Works, Inc., 316 F.2d 231 (3rd Cir. 1963). · Go Syfert
Search
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Delsea Iron Works, Inc., 316 F.2d 231 (3rd Cir. 1963). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: National Labor Relations Board v. Delsea Iron Works, Inc. (ca3, 1964-06-25)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) National Labor Relations Board v. Delsea Iron Works, Inc.
3rd Cir. · 1964 · confidence medium
The Board had previously found, as set forth in its prior decision, that the Company was engaged in commerce within the meaning of the Act. 136 N.L.R.B., supra, at 457, and that Local 676 had made an adequate showing of interest in the unit found appropriate.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
DELSEA IRON WORKS, INC.
14115.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Apr 23, 1963.
316 F.2d 231
Morton Namrow, N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, on the brief), for petitioner., Charles F. Jublon, President, Delsea Iron Works, Inc., Millville, N. J., for respondent.
Biggs, McLAUGHLIN, Per Curiam, Staley.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

The Board, in our opinion, was correct in holding that Delsea Iron Works, Inc., the respondent, violated Section 8(a) (1) and (3), 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(a) (1) and (3) of the National Labor Relations Act as amended, by discharging and later refusing to reinstate the thirteen strikers and that the walkout constituted protected concerted activity within the meaning of the Act. Indeed, the evidence admits of no other conclusion. We find the determination of the Board to be correct in all respects and accordingly its order must be enforced. A decree in the usual form may be submitted.