Int'l Union v. Weatherhead Co., 316 F.2d 239 (6th Cir. 1963). · Go Syfert
Search
Int'l Union v. Weatherhead Co., 316 F.2d 239 (6th Cir. 1963). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Dana Corporation (ca6, 2002-01-22)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Dana Corporation
6th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
In that case, the court held that the “final and binding” clause of the collective bargaining agreement only required that an arbitrator not reopen an earlier arbitration decision; the clause “does not so unequivocally import the principle of precedent into arbitral de-cisionmaking that Arbitrator Cass was obliged expressly to consider it lest his decision fail to draw its essence from the contract.” Id.; see also UAW Local Union No. 163 v. Weatherhead Co., 203 F.Supp. 612, 619 (ND.Ohio 1962), aff'd, 316 F.2d 239 (6th Cir.1963) (holding that the “final and binding” clause of the co…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers of America and Its Local Union No. 463 (Afl-Cio)
v.
The Weatherhead Company
15019.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Apr 30, 1963.
316 F.2d 239
Published

316 F.2d 239

INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AIRCRAFT AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA AND ITS LOCAL UNION NO. 463 (AFL-CIO), Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
The WEATHERHEAD COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15019.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

April 30, 1963.

1

Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division; Girard E. Kalbfleisch, District Judge.

2

Frank C. Heath, Cleveland, Ohio (Jones, Day, Cockley & Reavis, Frank C. Heath, Herbert J. Hansell, Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for appellant.

3

Lowell Goerlich, Washington, D. C., for appellee.

4

Before CECIL, Chief Judge, and BOYD and THORNTON, District Judges.

ORDER.

5

This cause came on to be heard upon the briefs, argument of counsel and the record in the case;

6

And it appearing upon due consideration that the disposition of this cause by the District Court is proper for the reasons set forth in its published opinion reported at 203 F.Supp. 612,

7

It is, therefore, Ordered and Adjudged that the judgment of the District Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.