Am. Union Transp., Inc. v. Matton Transp. Co., Inc., 317 F.2d 357 (2d Cir. 1963). · Go Syfert
Search
Am. Union Transp., Inc. v. Matton Transp. Co., Inc., 317 F.2d 357 (2d Cir. 1963). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
American Union Transport, Inc., as Owner of the Steamship Transunion, Libellant-Appellant
v.
Matton Transportation Co., Inc., Tug John E. Matton, Tug John E. Matton, Inc., Claimant-Appellee. Transamerican Steamship Corporation and American Union Transport, Inc., and Matton Transportation Co., Inc., Respondent-Impleaded-Appellee, Tug John E. Matton, Tug John E. Matton, Inc., Claimant-Impleaded-Appellee
27875_1.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
May 14, 1963.
317 F.2d 357
Published

317 F.2d 357

AMERICAN UNION TRANSPORT, INC., as owner of the STEAMSHIP
TRANSUNION, Libellant-Appellant,
v.
MATTON TRANSPORTATION CO., Inc., Respondent-Appellee, TUG
JOHN E. MATTON, Tug John E. Matton, Inc.,
Claimant-Appellee.
Transamerican Steamship Corporation and American Union
Transport, Inc., Respondents-Appellants, and Matton
Transportation Co., Inc., Respondent-Impleaded-Appellee, Tug
John E. Matton, Tug John E. Matton, Inc., Claimant-Impleaded-Appellee.

Nos. 338, 339, Dockets 27874, 27875.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued April 30, 1963.
Decided May 14, 1963.

Thomas J. Short, New York City (Dougherty, Ryan, Mahoney & Pellegrino, New York City, on the brief), for appellants Transamerican SS Corp. and American Union Transport, Inc.

Frank C. Mason, New York City (Mahar & Mason, New York City, on the brief), for appellees matton Transportation Co., Inc. and Tug John E. Matton, Inc.

Before CLARK SMITH and HAYS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

SS Transunion, which struck and damaged grain chutes at a Cargill pier at Albany when poorly managed in a strong wind, appeals from dismissal of its impleading petition and cross-libel against the tug John E. Matton which at the moment of damage was endeavoring to assist the Transunion. The ship's version of the accident was that instead of pulling the ship's bow from the pier the tug pushed, the tug's version that she was pulling but, called too late, unable in time to rescue the ship from the imminent collision with the dock structure. The issue was purely one of fact, resolved by an experienced trial judge on conflicting testimony. The judgment is surely not clearly erroneous. McAllister v. United States, 348 U.S. 19, 20, 75 S.Ct. 6, 99 L.Ed. 20.

2

Affirmed.