State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Russelle L. Lawson, 317 F.2d 925 (5th Cir. 1963). · Go Syfert
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Russelle L. Lawson, 317 F.2d 925 (5th Cir. 1963). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
Russelle L. LAWSON, Appellee
20343_1.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Jun 12, 1963.
317 F.2d 925
F. Carter Johnson, Jr., Porteous & Johnson, Ben C. Toledano, New Orleans, La., for appellant., Arthur C. Reuter, Reuter, Reuter & Schott, Patrick M. Schott, New Orleans, La., Malcolm H. Aukerman, Newport, Ind., for appellee.
Cameron, Hays, Per Curiam, Rives.
Published
PER CURIAM.

The sole question presented for review is whether the district court erred in denying the appellant’s, defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. We agree with the district court that the evidence-presented a case for the jury’s determination. The judgment is therefore

Affirmed.