Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 5881, United Mine Workers of Am., 323 F.2d 853 (6th Cir. 1963). · Go Syfert
Search
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 5881, United Mine Workers of Am., 323 F.2d 853 (6th Cir. 1963). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: C. Paul Rogers v. R. Howard Webster (ca6, 1985-11-07)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) C. Paul Rogers v. R. Howard Webster
6th Cir. · 1985 · confidence medium
R.B. v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Helpers, Etc., 592 F.2d 921, 928 (6th Cir.1979); N.L.R.B. v. Local 5881, United Mine Workers of America, 323 F.2d 853, 854 (6th Cir.1963).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Local 98, United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipe Fitting Industry v. National Labor Relations Board
6th Cir. · 1974 · confidence medium
B. v. Local 5881, United Mine Workers of America, 323 F.2d 853, 854 (6th Cir. 1963).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Local 98, United Ass'n of Journeymen v. National Labor Relations Board
6th Cir. · 1974 · confidence medium
N.L.R.B. v. Local 5881, United Mine Workers of America, 323 F.2d 853, 854 (6th Cir. 1963).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) National Labor Relations Board v. Lynair, Inc.
6th Cir. · 1967 · confidence medium
It is our belief, having in mind that the burden of proof is upon the petitioner herein (N.L.R.B. v. Dell, 309 F.2d 867, 869 (CCA 5) (1962)), and, having in mind that this burden must be sustained by clear and convincing evidence (N.L.R.B. v. Tupelo Garment Co., 122 F.2d 603 (5th Cir.)), and (N.L.R.B. v. Local 5881, U.M.W., 323 F.2d 853, 854 (CA 6)), that there had not been a fair chance for bargaining to succeed and ripen into a full agreement when the Company broke off negotiations immediately after July 27, 1964.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
LOCAL 5881, UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA, Respondents
14637_1.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Oct 23, 1963.
323 F.2d 853
Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., for petitioner., Grant F. Knuckles, Pineville, Ky., for respondent.
Cecil, Weick, O'Sullivan.
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

This cause is before the Court upon petition of the National Labor Relations Board for an order holding respondents, United Mine Workers of America, Local 5881, Walden Shrum, James Fults and Ambrose Magouirk, guilty of civil contempt of the decree and order of this Court heretofore entered on December 12,1961, in this cause.

Respondents answered said petition and the matter being at issue upon said petition and answer, this Court heretofore referred the matter to the Honorable Leslie R. Darr, Senior District Judge of the Eastern District of Tennessee, to act as Special Master for this Court, to hear the evidence in support of and in opposition to the said petition and to report to this Court his findings of fact, conclusions of law and recommendations.

The report of said Special Master has been duly filed in this Court and respondents have filed objections and exceptions thereto. This Court has reviewed the report of said Special Master and the objections and exceptions thereto, and has considered briefs filed in support of and in opposition to the said Special Master’s report, and upon consideration thereof is of the opinion that the findings of fact of the Special Master are not clearly erroneous and his conclusions of law are correct and his report together with his recommendations be and they are hereby approved, adopted and confirmed by this Court.

From such review, this Court is of the opinion that, except as to Ambrose Magouirk, the allegations of said petition of the NLRB averring that the mentioned respondents have been guilty of civil contempt, have been sustained and proved by clear and convincing evidence, and this Court does find that at the times and in the manner set forth in the said Master’s report, the defendant, Local 5881, United Mine Workers of America, Walden Shrum and James Fults, did commit acts in civil contempt of the decree and order of this Court, entered in this cause on December 12, 1961.

This Court is of the opinion that the respective fines and sanctions recommended by the Special Master should be imposed to insure obedience of this Court’s order; and that the remedies to be applied to insure such obedience be those recommended by the Special Master and those prayed for by the petitioner in its petition.

An order in conformity therewith and herewith may be prepared by said petitioner and submitted to this Court for approval and entry.

The petitioner shall forthwith prepare and submit for approval a proposed bill of costs to be assessed against the respondents found guilty of civil contempt.