green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.5 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2008
2017
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Rocha
it is axiomatic that, when a trial court bases a decision on multiple grounds, an appellant may prevail on appeal only after demonstrating that all of the bases for the court's decision were erroneous.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Rocha
it is axiomatic that, when a trial court bases a decision on multiple grounds, an appellant may prevail on appeal only after demonstrating that all of the bases for the court's decision were erroneous.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Combest
See State v. Delp, 218 Or App 17, 20, 26-27 , 178 P3d 259 , rev den, 345 Or 317 (2008) (concluding that the defendant did not have a protected privacy interest in records independently maintained by his ISP, which contained “the name, address, telephone number, subscriber number, local and long distance telephone billing records, length of service, and types of services utilized” for the defendant’s account).
discussed
Cited "see"
Murphy v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
See Cole v. Board of Parole, 220 Or App 362, 365 , 186 P3d 321 , rev den, 345 Or 317 (2008) (OAR 255-75-096 authorized the board to require the petitioner to serve until shortly before the “good time” date).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. McLarrin
See also State v. Delp, 281 Or App 17, 29 , 178 P3d 259 , rev den, 345 Or 317 (2008) (“None of the evidence offered by the state indepen- dent of the confession[—evidence of the defendant’s sexual interest in children, opportunity to commit the crimes, and the existence of a towel mentioned in the confession—]tends to demonstrate or gives rise to an inference that the alleged victim was the subject of the specific acts of sodomy and sex- ual abuse set forth in the indictment.”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE
v.
GATES.
v.
GATES.
S056330.
Oregon Supreme Court.
Oct 3, 2008.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Oregon (2)
Petition for review denied.