Magic Fingers, Inc. v. Robert E. Auger, 339 F.2d 604 (1st Cir. 1964). · Go Syfert
Magic Fingers, Inc. v. Robert E. Auger, 339 F.2d 604 (1st Cir. 1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
MAGIC FINGERS, INC., Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
Robert E. AUGER Et Al., Defendants, Appellees
6408_1.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
Dec 30, 1964.
339 F.2d 604
S. C. Yuter, New York City, with whom Glass & Greenapple, New York City, was on brief, for appellant., Robert H. Riñes, Boston, Mass., with whom Riñes & Riñes, Boston, Mass., was on brief, for appellees.
Woodbury, Aldrich, Caf-Frey.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

The very most that can be said for the appellant’s patent is that it discloses a mere mechanic’s adaptation of a device in public use and on sale more than a year before the patent was applied for to make that earlier device more readily attachable to the basic structure with, which it was designed to cooperate to-produce a vibrating chair or bed. We-see no need to elaborate upon the District Court’s fully and carefully reasoned opinion. D.C., 232 F.Supp. 372.

Judgment will be entered affirming the-judgment of the District Court dismissing count one of the plaintiff’s complaint.