No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Patrick Arthur ROBERTS, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
21450.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Nov 16, 1967.
385 F.2d 418
Bernard G. Winsberg, Los Angeles, CaT, for appellant., Wm. M. Byrne, Jr., U. S. Atty., Robert L. Brosio, Michael Heuer, Asst. U. S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Koelsch, Browning, Powell.
Published
PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks reversal of the judgment of the district court convicting him of violating the Dyer Act (18 U.S.C. § 2312). His assignments all concern the sufficiency of the evidence to support the finding of guilt and the propriety of the court’s ruling permitting the prosecution to reopen its case in chief. None has merit, nor tenders a question which on this record warrants discussion in an opinion.
We affirm.