green
Positive treatment
9.0 score
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Hill v. State
See United States v. Pereira, 574 F.2d 103 , 106 n. 6 (2nd Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 847 , 99 S.Ct. 145 , 58 L.Ed.2d 148 (1978) (illegality of arrest or detention is not a defense to charge of escape); United States v. Haley, 417 F.2d 625, 626 (4th Cir.1969) (“A prisoner’s complaints concerning the legality of his conviction or of his imprisonment should be addressed to proper administrative body or to the courts.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Brown
United States v. Haley, 417 F.2d 625, 626 (4th Cir.1969).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Clark v. James
United States v. Haley, 417 F.2d 625, 626 (4th Cir.1969).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Clark v. James
United States v. Haley, 417 F.2d 625, 626 (4th Cir.1969).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Beckett v. Cuyler
United States v. Haley, 417 F.2d 625, 626 (4th Cir. 1969).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Lynch
See, e.g., United States v. Cluck, 542 F.2d 728, 732 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 986 (1976); United States v. Smith, 534 F.2d 74, 75 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1100 (1977); United States v. Allen, 432 F.2d 939, 940 (10th Cir. 1970); United States v. Haley, 417 F.2d 625, 626 (4th Cir. 1969); Lucas v. United States, 325 F.2d 867 , 867-868 n.2 (9th Cir. 1963); Aderhold v. Soileau, 67 F.2d 259, 260 (5th Cir. 1933); In re Estrada, 63 Cal. 2d 740, 748-749 (1965); State v. Handran, 92 Idaho 579, 580-581 (1968); Henderson v. State, 198 Kan. 655, 656-657 (1967); State v. Perry, 364 …
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Mason
United States v. Franklin, 440 F.2d 1210, 1212 (7th Cir. 1971) ; United States v. Haley, 417 F.2d 625, 626 (4th Cir. 1969) ; Laws v. United States, 386 F.2d 816, 817 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1007 , 88 S.Ct. 1252 , 20 L.Ed.2d 307 (1967). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
NEWPORT MINING CORPORATION, Respondent
v.
NEWPORT MINING CORPORATION, Respondent
13227_1.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Oct 31, 1969.
Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Paul J. Spielberg and Richard N. Chapman, Attys., N. L. R. B., on brief for petitioner., Lacy I. Rice, Jr., John M. Miller, Rice, Hannis, Rice & Wagner, Martinsburg, W. Va., on brief for respondent.
Sobeloff, Boreman, Bryan.
Published
PER CURIAM:
Enforcement will be granted of the order of the National Labor Relations Board entered March 20,1968,170 NLRB No. 85, requiring the Newport Mining Corporation, operating in Barbour County, West Virginia, to bargain with the United Mine Workers of America as the exclusive bargaining representative of the corporation’s employees, and to desist from interfering with, restraining, or coercing the employees in the rights guaranteed them by Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 157.
In our judgment the order has substantial support in the evidence.
Order enforced.