green
Positive treatment
2.4 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles Larry Turchick and William Leo Tilton
(2×)
See and compare Churder v. United States, 387 F.2d 825 (8th Cir. 1968), second appeal, 417 F.2d 633 (8th Cir. 1969); Miller v. Sigler, 353 F.2d 424 (8th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 980 , 86 S.Ct. 1879 , 16 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William Hester
See, e. g., Churder v. United States, 294 F.Supp. 207, 212-214 (E.D.Mo.1968), aff’d per curiam, Churder v. United States, 417 F.2d 633 (8th Cir. 1969); Mitchell v. United States, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 57 , 259 F.2d 787, 792, 794 , cert. denied, 358 U.S. 850 , 79 S.Ct. 81 , 3 L.Ed.2d 86 (1958). 3.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Anther Larnce KING and James Albert King, Defendants-Appellants
v.
Anther Larnce KING and James Albert King, Defendants-Appellants
27167.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Oct 29, 1969.
417 F.2d 633
Ralph O. White, Batesville, Miss., Murray L. Williams, Water Valley, Miss., for appellants., H. M. Ray, U. S. Atty., William M. Dye, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Oxford, Miss., for appellee.
Brown, Jones, Carswell.
Published
PER CURIAM:
The appellants appeal from a sentence of the district court following their conviction for engaging in moonshine activities. Their contentions on appeal cannot be sustained. The judgment and sentence of the district court must be and it is
Affirmed.