green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.4 score
“libel and slander are not actionable under 42 u.s.c. 1983 .”
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Cox v. Ebel
libel and slander are not actionable under 42 u.s.c. 1983 .
cited
Cited "see"
Small v. Inhabitants of the City of Belfast
Accord Morey v. Independent School District, 312 F.Supp. 1257, 1262 (D.Minn.1969) (alternative ground), affd 429 F.2d 428 (8th Cir. 1970).
cited
Cited "see"
Eddington v. District R-III, St. Francois County Reorganized School District
See Morey v. Independent School District, 312 F.Supp. 1257, 1262 (D.C.Minn.1969), affirmed on district court’s opinion, 429 F.2d 428 (8 Cir. 1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
James G. Ellingburg v. A. G. Lucas, Correctional Employee, Cummins Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction
See Morey v. Independent School Dist., 429 F.2d 428 (8th Cir. 1970), affirming, 312 F.Supp. 1257, 1262 (D.Minn.1969); Azar v. Conley, 456 F.2d 1382, 1388-1389 (6th Cir. 1972); Heller v. Roberts, 386 F.2d 832 (2d Cir. 1967).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Edith MOREY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 492 Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
v.
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 492 Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
20005.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Aug 26, 1970.
John P. Walbran, of Walbran & Walbran, Owatonna, Minn., for appellant; William E. Falvey, of Hagglund & Johnson, Minneapolis, Minn., on the brief., Raymond B. Ondov, of Alderson, Catherwood & Ondov, Austin, Minn., for appellees; Miles B. Zimmerman, of Farrish, Zimmerman, Johnson & Manahan, Mankato, Minn., on the brief.
Vogel, Heaney, Bright.
Cited by 22 opinions | Published
Citer courts: D. Nebraska (1)
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff, Edith Morey, brought this action for damages against defendants, Independent School District 492 and its individual board members, basing her complaint on 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983, claiming failure to reimburse her for usual and customary scheduled salary increases and also defamation of character and exemplary damages. In an opinion granting defendants’ Rule 12 motion for dismissal, Judge Lord carefully and adequately demonstrated why plaintiff was not entitled to recover in this action. His opinion, which we adopt on appeal, is published as Morey v. Independent School District #492, et al., D.C.Minn., 1969, 312 F.Supp. 1257.
Affirmed.