Merle Don Rothman, Tr. v. John F. Forbes & Co., 442 F.2d 1350 (9th Cir. 1971). · Go Syfert
Search
Merle Don Rothman, Tr. v. John F. Forbes & Co., 442 F.2d 1350 (9th Cir. 1971). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: St. Lawrence Explosives Corp. v. Worthy Bros. Pipeline Corp. (nynd, 1996-02-26)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" St. Lawrence Explosives Corp. v. Worthy Bros. Pipeline Corp.
N.D.N.Y. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sears Roebuck & Co. v. Glenwal Co., 325 F.Supp. 86, 89-90 (S.D.N.Y.1970), aff'd, 442 F.2d 1350 (2d Cir.1971).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,720 Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. v. Ferdinand A. Neidhardt, and Erich Hoepfer, Stephen Rothchild Desimone
2d Cir. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Sears Roebuck & Co. v. Glenwal Co., 325 F.Supp. 86, 88 (S.D.N.Y.1970), aff'd, 442 F.2d 1350 (2d Cir.1971); Old Dutch Farms, Inc. v. Milk Drivers & Dairy Employees Union Local 581, 222 F.Supp. 125, 128 (E.D.N.Y.1963).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Merle Don ROTHMAN, Trustee, Appellant,
v.
JOHN F. FORBES & CO., Claimant, Appellee
25306.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Jun 3, 1971.
442 F.2d 1350
Richard S. Berger (argued), Bernard Shapiro, of Gendel, Raskoff, Shapiro & Quittner, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Chambers, Merrill, Ely.
Published
PER CURIAM:

On review here are two items of accountants’ fees in the amounts of $2,-413.35 and $4,117.85 as allowed preferences in bankruptcy proceedings.

We find the allowance of the $2,413.35 was clearly erroneous, which appellee virtually concedes.

We cannot find the award of $4,117.85 was clearly erroneous.

Remanded for a modification consistent herewith.