Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Provincial House, Inc., 445 F.2d 297 (6th Cir. 1971). · Go Syfert
Search
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Provincial House, Inc., 445 F.2d 297 (6th Cir. 1971). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
PROVINCIAL HOUSE, INC., Respondent
20988_1.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Jun 30, 1971.
445 F.2d 297
Janet Skaare Morris, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Leonard M. Wagman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief., Ronald R. Pentecost and Robert W. Stocker, II, Lansing, Mich., for respondent; Fraser, Trebilcock, Davis & Foster, Lansing, Mich., on brief.
Edwards, Celebrezze, Brooks.
Published

ORDER

The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order against the respondent, Provincial House, Inc. The Board’s decision and order are reported at 182 N.L.R.B. No. 45. The single issue involved is whether the Board correctly found that the Company had violated Section 8(a) (5) of the Act by its . admitted refusal to bargain with the[*298] duly certified representative of the nonprofessional employees of its nursing home in Hastings, Michigan. The Company based its refusal to bargain on the grounds that the certification of the Union in the underlying representation proceeding was invalid.

We have considered the record, the briefs and oral arguments of counsel, and conclude that the Board properly found that the admitted refusal of the Company to bargain with the Union was a violation of the Act and that the order of the Board should be enforced.

It is so ordered.