N. D. Wimberley, & v. Lt. J. Campoy, Corr. Officer, Folsom State Prison, 446 F.2d 895 (9th Cir. 1971). · Go Syfert
Search
N. D. Wimberley, & v. Lt. J. Campoy, Corr. Officer, Folsom State Prison, 446 F.2d 895 (9th Cir. 1971). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Apolinar Navarette, Jr., AKA Paul Medel Navarette v. Jiro J. Enomoto (ca9, 1976-07-29)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (rule) Apolinar Navarette, Jr., AKA Paul Medel Navarette v. Jiro J. Enomoto (6×) also: Cited "see"
9th Cir. · 1976 · confidence medium
See also Williams v. Gould, 486 F.2d 547, 548 (9th Cir. 1973); Handverger v. Harvill, 479 F.2d 513, 516 (9th Cir. 1973); Wimberley v. Campoy, 446 F.2d 895, 896 (9th Cir. 1971); Notaras v. Ramon, 383 F.2d 403, 404 (9th Cir. 1967).
cited Cited "see" Johnny X. Milton v. Louis S. Nelson
9th Cir. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wimberley v. Campoy, 446 F.2d 895 (9th Cir. 1971).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Viola McKinney v. Lee E. De Bord (2×)
9th Cir. · 1974 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Wimberley v. Campoy, 446 F.2d 895 (9th Cir. 1971).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
N. D. WIMBERLEY Et Al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
Lt. J. CAMPOY, Correctional Officer, Folsom State Prison, Appellee
71-1478.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Sep 16, 1971.
446 F.2d 895
N. D. Wimberley, in pro per., Doris H. Maier, Asst. Atty. Gen., Evelle J. Younger, Atty. Gen., Charles P. Just, Nelso P. Kempsky, Deputy Attys. Gen., Sacramento, Cal., for appellee.
Chambers, Hamley, Merrill, Per Curiam.
Cited by 5 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

In this civil rights (42 U.S.C. § 1983) suit, the summary judgment in favor of the defendant is affirmed.

Campoy seized papers, it is asserted, from the plaintiff’s jail house lawyers. He can’t do this any more under In Re Harrell, 2 Cal.3d 675, 87 Cal.Rptr. 504, 470 P.2d 640.

But at the time he did it he was enforcing prison regulations not yet declared invalid. Here this protects Campoy. That the regulations might be outlawed may have been forecast by Johnson v. Avery, 393 U.S. 483, 89 S.Ct. 747, 21 L.Ed.2d 718, but the event did not happen until Harrell came down after the seizure.

Campoy’s affidavit for summary judgment said he enforced the regulations in good faith. This was not contradicted by any opposing affidavit. Thus there was no genuine issue of fact remaining to be tried.