United States of Am., & v. Eric Alan Hedges, &, 449 F.2d 1289 (9th Cir. 1971). · Go Syfert
Search
United States of Am., & v. Eric Alan Hedges, &, 449 F.2d 1289 (9th Cir. 1971). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Hibernia National Bank v. John W. Carner (ca5, 1993-09-15)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Hibernia National Bank v. John W. Carner (2×)
5th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
In fact, "[t]he partners of an existing partnership may not be sued on a partnership obligation unless the partnership is joined as a defendant." LA.CODE CIV.P.ANN. art. 737 (1960 & Supp.1993); see Melancon v. Morrison-Knudsen International Co., 329 F.Supp. 981, 984 (W.D.La.) ("[A] judgment cannot be obtained against a member of a partnership upon a partnership obligation, while the partnership exists, except by also obtaining a judgment against the partnership itself"), aff'd, 449 F.2d 1289 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1048 , 92 S.Ct. 715 , 30 L.Ed.2d 739 (1972); Travelers Ins.
discussed Cited "see" Hibernia Nat. Bank v. Carner
5th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
In fact, "[t]he partners of an existing partnership may not be sued on a partnership obligation unless the partnership is joined as a defendant." LA.CODE CIV.P.ANN. art. 737 (1960 & Supp.1993); see Melancon v. Morrison-Knudsen International Co., 329 F.Supp. 981, 984 (W.D.La.) ("[A] judgment cannot be obtained against a member of a partnership upon a partnership obligation, while the partnership exists, except by also obtaining a judgment against the partnership itself"), aff'd, 449 F.2d 1289 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1048 , 92 S.Ct. 715 , 30 L.Ed.2d 739 (1972); Travelers Ins.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.
Eric Alan HEDGES, Defendant and Appellant
71-2025_1.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Oct 8, 1971.
449 F.2d 1289
Saltzman & Goldin, Hollywood, Cal., for defendant-appellant., Robert L. Meyer, U. S. Atty., Eric A. Nobles, Chief, Crim. Div., D. Henry Thayer, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.
Chambers, Choy, Battin.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction in this selective service case is affirmed.

The charge was that he failed to keep his local board advised of his address so that mail could reach him (here a notice of induction) while he traveled around with carnivals.

Whether he made a good faith effort to keep the board informed was a question of fact which has been decided against him on sufficient evidence.

Here the defendant testified. Lack of belief of a witness often permits some affirmative inferences. In our view, this is just such a case. Such inferences may have buttressed up other evidence.